Next: Basic Results   Up: Main Page   Previous: Early Results

Experimental Evaluation of Input Representations

We performed some initial experiments aimed at verifying the hypothesis that preprocessing of inputs speeds learning. The experimental design used (3 inputs spaces) X (2 outputs) X (2 tasks). The speed of learning was quantified by the time taken to reach an RMS error of 0.1 from the target values

The three input representations consisted of the raw pixel values and two neurologically inspired models, illustrated here in Figure 6.

 input filters

The center-surround filter is based on early retinal processing, while the oriented gradient represents an oriented filter, such as those in the complex cells. These three filters evaluate to +1 when over a constant area.

The two output spaces were those discussed above: the SEV (smooth-evaluation-function), and the FD (feature-detector).

The two tasks were 1) edge following and 2) line following. A basic graphic was generated to minimize confounding influences of noise and texture in real images, shown here in Figure 7.
 

 blobs

The neural network topology consisted of one input layer with five inputs, preprocessed as discussed above; there were 10 hidden units and one output unit (either SEV or FD). Other parameters held constant across the runs were: the initial training segment used; the pseudo-random network initialization; and the learning and momentum rates.
 


 Next: Basic Results   Up: Main Page   Previous: Early Results
 
stewart crawford